Published on March 24, 2005 By geekinthecity In
While Apple Computer's market share has been minuscule their role in the technology industry is not. It was Apple who brought computing power from the mainframe systems to the desktop. It was two guys named Steve who saw that there was a need and a desire for computers in homes, schools and small businesses. Computers were no longer limited to Governments, large corporations, and the military. Although the established manufacturers of mainframe systems such as IBM, Hewlett Packard, and Digital Equipment Corporation made huge shifts in the ways they did business to focus on desktop computers it wouldn't have happened the way it did if it wasn't for Apple.

Once desktop computers became mainstream due mostly to IBM and the thousands of startup companies producing clones of IBM's PC's, Apple set about making computers easy enough to use and bought forth the Macintosh. Even though the Macintosh was the first mass marketed graphical user interface, it was Microsoft who copied the idea and sold millions of copies of Windows that dominated desktop computers.

Towards the mid 1990's Apple brought forth another device that may not have dominated the market but definitely showed the way. In 1994 Apple introduced the Newton PDA. Even though the Newton could only find a small core of users the Newton PDA paved the way for other PDA's such as Palm that did go on to reach mass acceptance.

As the 1990's drew to an end, it was Apple computer who changed what computers looked like. Before Apple released the iMac, computers were almost always beige boxes that didn't offer much in the area of design. Now more than seven years after the original iMac hit the market even the most conservatively designed PC's are definitely not beige boxes.

After the iMac came Apple's first successful entry into consumer electronics, the iPod digital music player. At the time that the iPod was introduced there were portable MP3 players available on the market for several years but since then the iPod has become the digital music player that every other digital music player tries to emulate. Due mostly to Apple's own iTunes online music store. The songs purchased from iTunes will only play on the iPod which will not play songs purchased from other online music services.

While Apple Computer has really only reached a small niche of customers and has never even come close to market domination Apple computer has always been the trendsetter in the technology industry. Technology always seems to be about the 'The Next Big Thing' and many people look to Apple for some clue into what that next big thing is. It would be logical for Apple to continue down the path from computing into consumer electronics. It is rumored that the company that revolutionized how people record TV shows, TiVo is a possible merger target and that Apple would be a perfect suitor. A large screen G5 powered Mac with built in TiVo recorder with a CableCard slot would most certainly be the most formidable competition to PC's running Windows XP Media Center edition.

The Video on Demand offerings from cable companies are growing steadily, most VOD only offers the same movies that currently appear on Pay Per View. Apple has most certainly been successful with their iTunes Music Store. The next step in the path is video programming for sale available at any time to anyone with a broadband connection. An Apple online video store could start with Movies and recently aired TV shows and then offer everything right down to smallest independant feature and short films and even educational and instructional videos. One has to admit there's a lot of potential here.

As Apple as come up with new technological concepts which others have emulated with various degrees of success they have always played their hand close to their chest. It's always fun to speculate what Apple comes up with and amazing what they come up with.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 24, 2005
As for the whole 'Apples Suck' concept, I myself used to be against macs, mostly because I was always told that they only run their own software, no compatabily with the market. My High School is recieving about 1000 iBooks from apple, for almost nothing. It was then that i first used Mac OS X. I looked into it more, and actually it has compatability with everything i have. I feal in love with Mac OS X.

One theory for why Microsoft is more Succesful than Apple- Apple spends a good bit of money to build the pc, parts, software, so on. Where as Microsoft, which makes primary software, writes Windows, presses them to cds for less that a dollar each and sells them for about $100. People assume that since Microsoft is more successful, then their better. I personaly prefer Apple, and I dont mind paying for one.
on Sep 24, 2005
The reason so many people think Macs suck isn't due to their operating system or their hardware ,it's very simple ,I have a lifestyle ,I can build a PC and use software at my choice to suit that lifestyle , with Macs you're buying the lifestyle and living it to Apple's design.
I want a music player that will play anything and that I can use my choice of software with ,I love using OSX its a very good operating system but it isn't as flexible as windows my XP graphics computer is a very diffent beast from my friends XP audio system in both hardware and software because i know what hardware and software I want to use ,I don't need Steve Jobs to tell me what i "should" be using.
I'll be surprised if the bottom doesnt fall out of Apple's hardware business , OSX86 will run on PC's no matter what they do and maybe Steve Jobs will be alot happier than people think to have "no choice" but to license it for PC and go for Windows throat.
on Sep 24, 2005
I can build a PC and use software at my choice to suit that lifestyle , with Macs you're buying the lifestyle and living it to Apple's design.


I don't understand. I could build a PowerPC box and run Mac OS on it. I don't, because Macs are cheaper and look nicer than commodity designs I could use.

I can use software at my choice. I use OmniWeb as a Web browser, MacSOUP as news reader, two applications I have found no better replacements for and which aren't even available for Windows or Linux. And I have access to all the FOSS software available for Linux and UNIX.

Where exactly are Apple making it impossible for me to use the software of my choice???

I want a music player that will play anything and that I can use my choice of software with


I have not found anything iTunes wouldn't play. But then I haven't been looking. I prefer MP3 over other music formats and iTunes plays MP3. I believe iPods play what iTunes plays. And iTunes is my choice of software.

I love using OSX its a very good operating system but it isn't as flexible as windows.


Not as flexible? While the fact that the source code for the base system is available doesn't directly affect me, I can still replace almost all components of the system. I have, for example, replaced Quartz with X11, just for fun. That resulted in basically a Linux clone. I understand this is possible with Windows using Interix and an expensive X server software. But are there ports of the main package managers for Interix?

because i know what hardware and software I want to use ,I don't need Steve Jobs to tell me what i "should" be using


What exactly makes you think that Mac users use the software they use because Steve Jobs old them, while Windows users use what they want to use? I am more under the impression that Mac users are those who made a choice between Windows and Mac OS while Windows users are often unaware that they could have chosen something else; resulting in weird stories about Microsoft "forcing" people to use Windows and the like.

I use Windows at work every day and Macs at home. I use both systems for about 40 hours a week. I compile and install software at work and at home. And I would never buy a Windows PC. I find Windows too annoying: too many error messages (Mac OS summarises, Windows displays individual alert boxes), too many useful messages (lower right corner of the screen), and a file system that actually takes time to move or delete files instead of doing so instantly.
on Sep 26, 2005
Amazing. You raise ANY Apple topic and the whole thing devolves into a "WHICH IS THE BETTER OS?" discussion, or a "WHY SHOULD YOU BUY A MAC/PC" discussion. I believe the original topic related to what Apple's next technical innovation would be. I don't see how Microsoft comes into the discussion at all. I have to say that the suggestion of an iConsole does sound promising. Download the games with an adaptation of iTunes. No need for vulnerable DVD's that my kids always seem to lose the manuals for.
on Sep 29, 2005
I think that Apple will try to get into the communications hardware next. With Intel supplying chips they might be able to push out a phone/internet browser/iPod/video conferencing/e-mail... okay, well you get the picture - an all in one, small communications device. Sure Motorola makes chips for phones as well, but Apple has had many issues with supply from them. (Not entirely Motorola's fault - Apple's ideas of what consumers will want has always been off. The iPod wasn't originally thought of to be a hot-ticket item like it has been.)

I think that Apple has the talent to take a Windows Mobile or Palm type device to the next level, and I'd be willing to bet they're looking in that direction.

Now if they could market their ideas....
on Sep 29, 2005
So Apple, What's Next? Thursday, March 24, 2005


A pinePod?


SEEKING "A WEAKER NO. 1". So, some music executives were probably thrilled when iPod rival Creative Technology (CREAF ) announced that it had captured a patent for the user interface of its Zen Micro music player. Since the patent may also apply to the iPod's famous interface, Creative could potentially seek hefty royalties from Apple.

And Craig McHugh, president of Creative's U.S. unit, aims to use the patent to chip away at Apple's reputation for being the industry's only innovator. "When people hear we have the patent that makes these devices so easy to use, who really is the inventive company? It could cause people to reevaluate what they think [about Apple]."

The whole article:
What's the Next Verse in Apple's Song?
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2005/tc2005096_6224_tc210.htm
on Sep 29, 2005
You raise ANY Apple topic and the whole thing devolves into a "WHICH IS THE BETTER OS?" discussion, or a "WHY SHOULD YOU BUY A MAC/PC" discussion.


It's true. It is an interesting phenomenom. It could be a law, but I don't think it happens all the time.

What does happen is that many Mac users like myself, immidiately feel a need to defend Apple and ourselves, because some Windows users will always declare that the reason they use the same OS as everybody else is because they don't want to be told what software to use and that they want a flexible (new word for closed-source?) system.
on Oct 11, 2005
Okay everybody lets bow down to the great and all knowing god. . . .Apple computers and Steve Jobs. Just think if it was for them the computer would no have ever made its was into our homes, or into the work place.

God!, I so tired of hearing how great Apple is; if is so great a computer why isn't it setting on every desk on planet earth. And, yes I own an Apple Mac as well as my to sons. There has been a Mac in our house since December 1987, but that doesn't mean it is all that great. Since XP I spend very little time on the Mac. Sorry it just not as much fun. Try and use programs like Desktop X, Style XP, Windowbilinds, Winstep, Etc. There are so many things you can do in XP that you can't do on the Mac.

Still there is one thing to remember a computer is only as good as the individual using it, or who has learned what its potental can be.

Pam
on Oct 12, 2005
if is so great a computer why isn't it setting on every desk on planet earth.


I gave up believing that quality had anything to do with popularity when the pokemon craze hit.

2 Pages1 2